First cigarettes, then potato chips. Now your hand lotion, toothpaste, and shaving gel might soon flaunt a warning label.
Shoppers should know that one-third of cosmetics contain iffy and maybe cancer-causing junk, the FDA said in February. If the agency sticks to its guns, then the 99 percent of all personal care potions that contain even a single mystery ingredient may have to blare: "Warning: The safety of this product has not been determined."
While you wonder if the sunscreen you're basting in caused lab rats to grow tumors and slowly rot, look it up in the new SafeCosmetics.org database. The nonprofit Environmental Working Group rates products with safety scores from one to a red-flag five. My Avalon lavender hand lotion gets a safe 1.3 score (left), while Vaseline Intensive Care lotion (right), gets a murky 4.2. That Avalon lotion might be a candidate for the green "USDA Organic" label, whose ups and downs the New York Times describes today.
There's been little regulation of the chemical cocktails within personal care products, such as the hormone disrupters inside Clairol Herbal Essences shampoo, which I pick on. Until lately, the FDA has largely ignored the "C" in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FDC) Act since the law passed in 1938. Fair labeling standards were set up in 1966, but have really only applied to drugs and food. As the Ecologist's Pat Thomas puts it:
On average, we each use nine personal care products a day containing 126 different ingredients. Such "safety" testing as exists looks for reactions, such as skin redness, rashes or stinging, but does not investigate potential long-term problems for either humans or the environment. Yet the chemicals that go into products such as shampoos and hand creams are not trace contaminants. They are the basic ingredients.
Cosmetics companies complain of unfounded hysteria, but scientists are finding industrial plasticisers such as phthalates in urine, preservatives known as parabens in breast-tumour tissue, and antibacterials such as Triclosan and fragrance chemicals like the hormone-disrupting musk xylene in human breast milk. Medical research is proving that fragrances can trigger asthma; that the detergents in shampoos can damage eye tissue; and that hair-dye chemicals can cause bladder cancer and lymphoma…If these problems had been linked to pharmaceutical drugs, the products would have been taken off the market.
Thank you very much for the post. This is a pretty good post. Keep posting such interesting topics. Cheers.
Posted by: skin cancer treatments Los Angeles | 2010.12.18 at 11:45 PM
Scientist always do research and found something such as chemicals that are bad for our health but why is it that we always found it in the market still for sale. Or is it just us depending on the fast results and some kind practical...
Posted by: Susan "Anti Aging Eye Cream" Jenner | 2010.09.24 at 12:36 AM
I would like the river monsters to come to west virginia and investigate the dam at cotton hill fayette county .They say that there is fish bigger than a volkswagon. would love to know how true it is thamk you. it would be great to have river monsters to come to fulton new york to investigate these sturgeon bcuz ive never seen one in those waters and it was amazing.
Posted by: viagra online | 2010.08.19 at 12:07 PM
http://oppao.net/n-ona/
http://oppao.net/navi/
http://oppao.net/new-d2/
http://oppao.net/fd3/
http://oppao.net/soap2/
http://oppao.net/bg2/
http://oppao.net/host2/
http://oppao.net/lesson2/
http://oppao.net/op2/
http://oppao.net/fl3/
http://oppao.net/bb2/
http://oppao.net/s-este/
http://oppao.net/rd2/
http://oppao.net/kawa/
http://oppao.net/n-club2/
http://s-auc.net/
Posted by: オテモヤン | 2010.03.26 at 11:38 PM
Medical research is proving that fragrances can trigger asthma; that the detergents in shampoos can damage eye tissue; and that hair-dye chemicals can cause bladder cancer and lymphoma…
Posted by: buy viagra | 2010.03.26 at 10:28 AM
Thanks to your post, I am now more aware in choosing a skin care product.
Sam Nisbett
Posted by: bladder control | 2010.03.02 at 09:14 AM
I feel it would be ideal to apply the same principle I do to food that I do on what cosmetic products I use, however in today's modern world, this is not only impractical, but almost entirely impossible; but I do try.
Even with the widespread trend of organic and natural goods becoming more and more accessible, I know it's impossible to do this without exception even in regards to food. I try to refrain from eating processed goods as much as I can; what doesn't come from the earth or naturally exist, I won't put in my mouth.
Read the ingredients on the label, and if you can recognize most of them -or have at least some inkling of an idea as to their origins- chances are it's probably alright. If not... you might want to rethink putting it back on the shelf.
Posted by: Charmaine Waldrop | 2006.10.07 at 05:47 PM